Administrative Law Judges
Official O*NET title: Administrative Law Judges, Adjudicators, and Hearing Officers (23-1021.00)
Also called: adjudications specialist, adjudicator, administrative hearings officer, administrative judge, administrative law judge
Do you do this at work?
Answer each card — it takes about a minute.
Do you do this at work?
Determine existence and amount of liability according to current laws, administrative and judicial precedents, and available evidence
Swipe right for yes, left for not me. On a keyboard: → yes, ← not me, Z undo. +2 XP per answer.
How AI is changing administrative law judges work
4 of 10 measurable main tasks for this job show up in real AI-use data, so we rate it Amber (some AI use) — 40%.
This shows where people already use AI, not whether the job will disappear. How we measure this.
Tasks in this job and recorded AI use
- Determine existence and amount of liability according to current laws, administrative and judicial precedents, and available evidence (main task) — a lot of recorded AI use
- Research and analyze laws, regulations, policies, and precedent decisions to prepare for hearings and to determine conclusions (main task) — a lot of recorded AI use
- Prepare written opinions and decisions (main task) — some recorded AI use
- Explain to claimants how they can appeal rulings that go against them (main task) — some recorded AI use
- Monitor and direct the activities of trials and hearings to make sure that they are conducted fairly and that courts administer justice while safeguarding the legal rights of all involved parties (main task) — no recorded AI use
- Conduct hearings to review and decide claims regarding issues (main task) — no recorded AI use
- Rule on exceptions, motions, and admissibility of evidence (main task) — no recorded AI use
- Issue subpoenas and administer oaths in preparation for formal hearings (main task) — no recorded AI use
- Schedule hearings (main task) — no recorded AI use
- Review and evaluate data on documents (main task) — no recorded AI use
- Authorize payment of valid claims and determine method of payment — no recorded AI use
- Talk with individuals or organizations involved in cases to obtain relevant information — no recorded AI use
- Recommend the acceptance or rejection of claims or compromise settlements according to laws, regulations, policies, and precedent decisions — no recorded AI use
- Conduct studies of appeals procedures in field agencies to make sure adherence to legal requirements and to help with determination of cases — no recorded AI use
Tasks: O*NET 31.0. AI use: Anthropic Economic Index (exact or close text match).
Your first steps (guidance)
- Week 1: Open a free AI assistant and say hello. Follow our “Getting started with AI” guide. Ask it one simple question about your work.
- Week 2: Use AI on one task you do often. Try the prompt for: “Determine existence and amount of liability according to current laws, administrative and judicial precedents, and available evidence”. Try the prompt for: “Research and analyze laws, regulations, policies, and precedent decisions to prepare for hearings and to determine conclusions”.
Tick your own tasks above to get a plan based on what you really do. The first 2 weeks are free; Premium (coming soon) adds weeks 3–12. New to AI? Read our beginner’s guide.
Questions about AI and administrative law judges
Will AI replace administrative law judges?
Our data can’t predict job losses, and we don’t try to. What it does show: 4 of the 10 main tasks for this job match tasks people already use AI for (Anthropic Economic Index), giving a Amber rating (some AI use). Using AI on a task is not the same as AI doing the whole job, and 10 of the 14 listed tasks show no recorded AI use yet.
Which administrative law judge tasks is AI used for most?
In the data, the most AI use among this job’s tasks is for: determine existence and amount of liability according to current laws, administrative and judicial precedents, and available evidence; research and analyze laws, regulations, policies, and precedent decisions to prepare for hearings and to determine conclusions; prepare written opinions and decisions.
Which administrative law judge tasks show little or no AI use?
For example: monitor and direct the activities of trials and hearings to make sure that they are conducted fairly and that courts administer justice while safeguarding the legal rights of all involved parties; conduct hearings to review and decide claims regarding issues; rule on exceptions, motions, and admissibility of evidence. These are good places to keep building your own skills.
How does this job compare to others?
In Microsoft Research’s “Working with AI” study, this job’s AI applicability score is equal to or higher than 49% of the occupations they scored. That measures overlap with AI chat use, not risk of job loss.
How can a administrative law judge start learning AI?
Start small: open a free AI assistant, try it on one task you do often, and always check facts and numbers yourself. The plan on this page is guidance, not professional advice.
See how this job ranks
Administrative Law Judges ranks #193 of 572 jobs for the share of main tasks with AI use (#1 = most), and #3 of 6 in Legal.
Related jobs
- Will AI change lawyers?
- Will AI change judicial law clerks?
- Will AI change mediators and arbitrators?
- Will AI change judges and magistrates?
- Will AI change paralegals and legal assistants?
- Will AI change title examiners?
- Will AI change insurance claims adjusters?
- Will AI change labour relations specialists?
- See all jobs